[nas-2000] Re: Performance SMB vs FTP
- From: Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nas-2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:11:57 +0200
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:58, philipp Wehrheim wrote:
> Hi Aurel,
>
> im quite bussy (my girlfrind is just finishing here dip.thesis and we
> are doing the formating now).
You should have it written in TeX :-) Then you wouldn't need any further
formatting.
>
> The voting (umfrage) thing could be done in the wiki because the
> mediawiki supports tex so a simple table should do (I guess).
> Julius cv say that he has some knowledge about tex :-) so if
> julius has some time .... maybe ... please :-)
uhm, fine, but I just don't get what you guys mean. Tables can be done in wiki
anyway and for voting you need TeX ?
>
> As mentioned earlier I'll be in germany from Sa. till We.
>
> Aurel schrieb:
> > Flip,
> >
> > Is it possible to add a sondage (Umfrage) on your webpage where people
> > can enter their performances informations (so that we could compare
> > evolution of perfs with nas versions, firmwares, file systems and so
> > on....)
> >
> > Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> On Thursday 17 May 2007 18:56, Aurelien wrote:
> >>> Julius,
> >>>
> >>> Have you got a Nas-1000 or Nas-2000 by the way?
> >>
> >> I've got NAS-2000, I'll send pictures of my hardware next week to
> >> compare it with yours.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> [Julius Loman][lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx][http://lomo.kyberia.net][icq:35732873]
> >
> > --
> > Aurel
--
[Julius Loman][lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx][http://lomo.kyberia.net][icq:35732873]
Other related posts:
