This is a slight misunderstanding; I was not commenting on the suitability for photographs but rather on the ability of using the LIDE 20 under OS X which works fine using Cannon's software!! >> I believe the LIDE 20 function in Classic mode, but the LIDE 80 is >> fully >> O/S X. Paul On Feb 15, 2004, at 7:46 PM, Tee Cashmore wrote: > Paul Thomas wrote: > >> I have been using the LIDE 20 for quite a while and found it very >> satisfactory using their CanoScan Toolbox X - this is the OS X >> version downloaded from the Cannon site - you can check it out - the >> only problem that I have had is that my OCR software OmniPage 8 SE >> (which works fine but runs in Classic mode - to upgrade was to cost >> several 100 $ !! ). Unfortunately the Scanner does not want to work >> IF >> OS 9 is running - so it has to be stopped - not too serious but >> annoying!! But, yes, to summarise, LIDE 20 does run under OS X !! >> >> Paul >> > Yes Paul, but the LIDE 20 is only 600 Dpi optical, whereas the 80 is > 2400 Dpi, an important difference in photographic terms, also the 80 is > fully native X, the 20 isn't really; I just rechecked the web site & > asked tech help for confirmation. > The 20 for me would be a downgrade from my Epson 1250 Photo, but the 80 > would be a major upgrade. > TTFN, > TeeC > > > _________________________________________________ > > For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on > > http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo > > Don't forget to periodically check our web site at: > > http://muglo.on.ca/ > _________________________________________________ For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo Don't forget to periodically check our web site at: http://muglo.on.ca/