The problem is that I have 9 lanes. To try a single assembly with all these data was my first thought but I dont believe that I have the amount of ram to do that. Each try consumes 65 - 85 G. As it seems for a job like that I will need more than 0.5 T which I can afford at the moment. Thank you very much for the process that you propose me (Sanger), its great to learn new things and techniques, but I don't believe that I could do something like that even I wanted to On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:59 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:44 PM, lenis vasilis <val1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yes, they are very similar, only 3-5 bases are mismatching. >> The problem is that there are some regions with low coverage >> and some others that I have picks with around 50% with one >> letter and around 50% with other. I don't know if this is based >> on assembly- mapping error or a pcr error. > > I would try a single assembly of all three lines together, which > should give a consensus. > > It may be a real variation in the population, or a sequencing error, > or even as you say a PCR error. But I wouldn't be worrying about > tiny differences like this unless they are in a region of interest > (e.g. within a gene important for your research question). > > Alternatively, you could design primers and use "Sanger" > capillary sequencing to check these regions in more detail. > But I would need a strong reason to do all that work. > > Peter > > -- > You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk > mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please > visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html