Yes, they are very similar, only 3-5 bases are mismatching. The problem is that there are some regions with low coverage and some others that I have picks with around 50% with one letter and around 50% with other. I don't know if this is based on assembly- mapping error or a pcr error. On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:28 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:12 PM, lenis vasilis <val1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thank you very much for your support. >> I did the conversion by using the maf2sam.py, the script that you have in >> your blog. > > OK, that should work too - I updated it to cover the current MIRA > file format. > >> Now, at the moment I'm trying to identify how the unpadded file >> filled the gaps from the padded one. > > Browsing the assembly in Tablet/IGV should help give you > a feel for the inserts and how padded versus unpadded > output from MIRA is a different representation of the same > assembly. > >> I used Mira three times with the data of three different lanes. >> The three unpadded consensus are different in 3-5 bases only. >> If the assembly was alright I suppose that these three consensus >> should be exactly the same, shouldn't be? > > No. If you are very very lucky, then maybe. Even assuming > the DNA that went into the three lanes was the same, you will > have different errors in the reads, so there is no guarantee > the three assemblies will give you identical contigs. I would > expect the ending points of the contigs to differ slightly, > and in lower coverage regions apparent SNPs between > the three assemblies seem quite likely. > > But at a high level, the three assemblies should be very similar. > > Peter > > -- > You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk > mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please > visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html