On Oct 15, 2012, at 6:30 , Joel barratt wrote: > Sorry about the slow reply. I have been trying to find the best way to > compress the log file - but it is too large to email (it is 1.4GB > uncompressed and I can compress it down to about 74MB - but still too large > for my email). Is there any other way I could get this file to you? Dropbox would be one way, but no need anymore, see below. > Yep I thought so as well - I was getting a little worried it was looping > about or doing something strange. However, I think you will find it is "one > of those" projects. The sample came from cultures of a parasite which also > contained an undefined mixture of bacteria. I extracted the RNA and used > oligo dt cellulose chromatography to enrich for parasite mRNA but there was > still around 10-20% bacterial RNA's in there I'm guessing. ALso, Some of the > parasite mRNA's are quite repetitive as are some of the bacterial mRNA's. That qualifies as "one of those". Reads in the 2 digit millions and I suppose 200k to 500k contigs? Would you be interested in trying the current head of development? I haven't released it yet because I have replaced large parts of the internal machinery and I want to do some more tests, but at least it runs quite stable now ... exceptions notwithstanding. And it is a factor of 2 to 3 faster for a project similar to yours. I'd be interested on feedback regarding the assembly itself. B. -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html