On Oct 24, 2012, at 10:01 , Dimitar Kenanov <dimitar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Btw, i think ive read before that MIRA uses around 1.5Gb RAM per million of > Illumina reads. I have 2 questions regarding this: > 1. Is it still so? Uh, I'd need to check. It obviously also depends on the read length, but for 100bp in 3.4.x I think it's a good estimate, in 3.9 I reduced this (not by much, but still). > 2. Is this 1.5Gb per million single reads? I mean that for paired-end it will > be 3GB. It is always per read, not per pair, triplet or whatever the sequencing industry may still invent :-) B. -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html