Joe, I agree with using the 39 Ohm resistor to get to 50 Ohms, but in tests I've just run here, that only dropped the output into a 50 Ohm load by some two dBm. Right now I'm seeing .985V RMS output on my scope, which correlates to just about +13 dBm, and that's with the 39 Ohm resistor in place. I'm also seeing +13 dBm on my power meter, which backs up the voltage reading. This indicates that a resistive pad would still be needed to get the output down to the +7 dBm level. Have you run similar tests there? Thank you, Wayne > On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Joe Rocci <joe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The Si570 drives about +13 dbm into a 50 ohm load and its output impedance is > around 13 ohms. With that assumption, all you need is a series 39 ohm > resistor to the mixer LO input. This will create a nice impedance match for > the mixer and will also drop the Si570 drive level just about into the sweet > spot. > > Joe > W3JDR > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Wayne McFee > To: minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:23 PM > Subject: [minima] Re: A (temporary) solution to my mixer problems > > Dan, > > That's right, it is simply PI network attenuator consisting of three > resistors, with two going to ground and one bridging the top ends of the two. > > Like so: > > In - rrrrrrr - Out > r r > r r > r r > G G > > There are PI network calculators on line which will tell you what value > resistors to use. > > In my case a 10 dB attenuator was needed, so I used two 100 Ohm resistors to > ground and a 68 Ohm resistor between the two. > > Hope that helps. > > Wayne > > >> On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Mvs Sarma <mvssarma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> hi Dan, >> IMHO , is conventional to call T or Pi attenuator a pad.(three resistors >> forming a T attenuator or pi attenuator.) >> >>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Dan Reynolds <on30ng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Wayne, for us dummies can you show us what the pad looks like - schematic. >>> Just need a brain check. >>> >>> >>> 73 >>> Dan -- KB9JLO >>> https://sites.google.com/site/on30ng/ >>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Wayne McFee <nb6m@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Thomas, >>>> >>>> I'm into a second build of the Minima and am using an ADE-1 as the first >>>> mixer as well. >>>> >>>> Since the Si570 output is some +13 dBm, and the ADE-1 needs only +7dBm LO >>>> drive, I placed a 50 Ohm resistive pad in line to reduce it down to that >>>> level. >>>> >>>> If you haven't yet done that, you should as that will help reduce spurious >>>> responses from the mixer and should reduce LO leakage on transmit as well. >>>> >>>> I have just the receive portion built so far, so cannot yet give you ye >>>> figures from mine. >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> >>>> Wayne NB6M >>>> >>>> >>>> > On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Thomas Sarlandie >>>> > <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Gang, >>>> > >>>> > After looking at the RF386 this afternoon I came to the conclusion that >>>> > my only problem was my Minima. With -30 dBm on the output my signal was >>>> > just too low, even for the RF386. >>>> > >>>> > I looked into the recent discussions about mixers and wanted to build >>>> > one of them but I do not have the IC you discussed and I could not find >>>> > a clear call on which one of the JFET mixers was the best. >>>> > >>>> > So I took a step back and realized that (to me) this project is more >>>> > about building a working radio than running lots of mixers experiment. I >>>> > completely removed the KISS mixer from my Minima and replaced it with >>>> > one of the ADE-1 mixer that I had ordered a few months ago. >>>> > >>>> > My output is now at -15dBm @14.250 and -26@34.25. >>>> > >>>> > <dsa 201410211956.png> >>>> > >>>> > I should now have plenty enough power to drive the RF386! >>>> > >>>> > I think we should recommend this solution to new builders who are just >>>> > getting started, at least until we have a good mixer that can easily and >>>> > repeatability be built with good performance. >>>> > >>>> > I paid $15 for 4 of them on eBay. $3.5 a piece. >>>> > >>>> > Thoughts? >>>> > >>>> > 73, >>>> > thomas >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Sarma