[lit-ideas] Re: passing by?
- From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:08:59 +0000 (GMT)
Despite being on the list more than a short time, I remain unsure about these
occasional posts that simply re-state or re-post an earlier post without any
comment etc. Are they sent by mistake? Are they a way of posting 'I second
that'? Sometimes one, sometimes the other?
Donal
Seeking enlightenment
Passing By
London
________________________________
From: Mike Geary <jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012, 5:03
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: passing by?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Torgeir Fjeld <torgeir_fjeld@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The list now exhibits symptoms of what one German thinker would have referred
to as the eternal recurrence of phil.lit. Should our question not be if these
returning contributors are passers-by, with a temporary indulgence in a past
community worth only the sentimental singular stab, or if they will remain and
share of their knowledge, flair and talent for that which is pleasing to the
aesthetically minded intellect?
>
>Best regards,
>Torgeir Fjeld
>Oslo, Norway
>
>http://independent.academia.edu/TorgeirFjeld // http://facebook.com/phatic
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
>digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
Other related posts:
