[lit-ideas] Re: The make up of security forces in Iraq
- From: "Judith Evans" <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:41:47 +0100
If what I said was a quibble, Lawrence, then the whole of your post wasn't
worth bothering with.
(Come to think of it....)
----- Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Helm
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 6:20 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The make up of security forces in Iraq
Ah, one of your famous quibbles. I should have known.
------------Original Message------------
From: "Judith Evans" <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, Sep-19-2007 10:12 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The make up of security forces in Iraq
And you say I'm a "silly man" for not believing anti-American, pacifistic
attacks against them?
This is why I said you were a silly man, Lawrence; because you said
>the Leftists and anti-Americans attacking anything remotely American.
> But the security forces in Iraq aren't completely American
and thought you'd caught 'Leftists and anti-Americanists; out by saying
that (because according to you, 'Leftists and anti-Americanists' only
criticise America and Americans).
I hope that's clear, because I really can't be bothered to explain it all
again
----- Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Helm
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 5:10 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The make up of security forces in Iraq
As I said, I have worked with military and former military people all my
life. And you say I'm a "silly man" for not believing anti-American,
pacifistic attacks against them? The very nature of pacifism is silly. I
would use a stronger word to describe anti-Americans. And I note once again,
once again, still and always, never without break attacks against American
coupled by no, none, zero, NONE against the most vile entity in the world
today, Islamism. It is their firm belief that infidels should be killed.
Murder is part of their religion and you attack those defending state
department officials against them? That is much worse than silly.
Lawrence
Other related posts:
