I know personally that there are tons of things I'd like to ask, talk about or respond to that pertain specifically to philosophy, but that I don't have the time I'd like for that right now. I don't think the issue is that people have lost the desire to talk about these things, just that they don't initiate many posts of that sort (as I don't) because they simply don't have the time to put all the thought they'd like into sustaining them. Erin Toronto Quoting Andy Amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I recently had an off list exchange with a list member regarding what might > be described as the "Golden Age" of the list. I offered this in reponse. I > would like to now post it to the list. > > > A.A. People cannot be stopped from what they want to do. If they wanted to > discuss > Wittgenstein or Popper or Plato, they would. If they aren't, then the > question > needs to be addressed as to why, without short answering "new > people". Michael Chase, for example, has posted, and no one has answered. > Why? Are these people no longer subscribed? If so, assuming they want to > discuss > philosophy, why are they no longer subscribed? Is this not a forum filled > with > philosophers? Assuming too that there is a "new mix", can the old mix > not carry on their own threads among themselves? Must the answer be as > simple as, > there are new people, so therefore we can't talk about what we really want to > talk > about? > > [End of excerpt.] Personally, I think there's a huge world out there. > Philosophy is just one part of it. > > > Andy > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > -- Erin ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html