[lit-ideas] Re: The Perils Of Teaching Women How To Read
- From: Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:21:30 -0600
Women, in general, tend to more sophisticated means than those physical. If
you really want to watch your backs, guys.... guns and fences ain't gonna be
the ways to do it. Of course, if you doubt this, chances are you've been
knocked down by less oafish means and don't yet know it or that you yet will
and won't then know it for a bit. That's okay. We'll give you plenty of
time.
Julie Krueger
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Lawrence Helm
<lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Anyone who hasn’t been knocked down by a woman is probably gay.
>
>
>
> Lawrence
>
> San Jacinto
>
>
>
> *From:* lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Mike Geary
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 26, 2009 1:51 PM
> *To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [lit-ideas] The Perils Of Teaching Women How To Read
>
>
>
> I've dreaded this day for years, knowing it was bound to come
> eventually. Teaching women to read led to giving them the vote and the next
> thing you know they're attacking the Pope. Physically!!! A Papal smack
> down right there in the center of Christendom. I advise all men to start
> carrying guns (those who aren't already), we have something like 50,000
> years of misogynism to account for. Seeing how easy it is to take down the
> head man, women are sure to start knocking all us males around. Take heed.
> Never be alone and unarmed with a woman. Never.
>
>
>
> Mike Geary
>
> Memphis
>
Other related posts:
