[lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:55:55 -0700
John Wager wrote:
'The move that Taylor needs to make next is to go from what people,
from their limited perspectives (whether of the food they eat, or
the religions [plural, except for the 'people of the book'] they
affirm), to some more global, universal perspective. "The many do not
give the same answer as the wise" (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics).
What is there behind what people "like" that makes it "good" for them?
What is it that Taylor will come up with that lets him get at this more
universal "good?" '
Weren't Plato and Aristotle the first to argue that what one 'likes' is
almost entirely independent of the good (and not just of 'the Good but
of what was good for one)? I hope that Taylor isn't going to suggest
that what I'll call 'mere likes' (a preference for gin over Scotch, or
for tulips over daffodils) are what make up one's 'goods.' It seems
unlikely that such a shallow conception of the goods which constitute
oneself would be a starting point for discussing the slippery notion of
'the self.' So, I think John's asking just the right question: how do we
get from a motley of possibly shifting likes and dislikes to anything
like 'a good'?
Agreement and disagreement about likes and dislikes at this level can
certainly go on within a 'group' (culture?) without this genuinely
creating interesting or cohesive subgroups, one would think. The
ubiquity of Coca-Cola is different in a way that might be hard to
articulate from the spread of a religion—but what prevents a liking for
Coke an important part of who one is or the frame from which one views
the world (and by reflection?) oneself?
So far, I'm not sure how Taylor distinguishes between what I think is
good (health), what I value (privacy), what I like (ice cream). One can
always construct sentences ('I like democracy'), in which these
differences seem to disappear. But at some metaphysical level (as we
like to say) they ought to be different if this project is to go anywhere.
Robert Paul
Reed College
Robert Paul
Reed College
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: SoS-Chapter 2, Moral Frameworks