Omar Kusturica wrote: "In places where social conditions, regimes, ideologies, borders, even states change more frequently, it is much more difficult to locate that stable framework within which you were formed and within which you happily take stances on things. (Not to mention that Taylor' terms sound very academic; most people define themselves through subjective preferences, i.e. what I like and what I don't like, rather than "what is good, what I endorse and what I oppose" and so on) The things are further complicated if you have changed several geographical locations." My experience has been quite the opposite. What I have seen is that when people experience massive upheaval, the first things to go are 'what I like and don't like' and what endures are exactly the sorts of things Taylor talks about. What I saw was people holding on dearly to tribal/national/familial/religious 'frameworks' as ways of helping orient themselves in chaotic times. What about in the former Yugoslavia? What would be more important, being Croat or Serb, or Orthodox or Muslim, or liking coffee or tea? Ultimately Taylor comes up short, but with the point that people rely on accounts of the good, he is spot on. Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html