(quick, what color is the most serious threat level?) Teal. Followed secondarily by mauve. Julie Krueger preferring azure and lapis ========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Radical Islam: The Primer Date: 1/9/2007 7:35:07 A.M. Central Standard Time From: _cabrian@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:cabrian@xxxxxxxxx) To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: John, my original premise of having an office dealing with ideological and informational warfare instead of Homeland Security is based on my belief that the DHS was a mistake from the start. It added another black hole in the yawning bureaucracy of the intelligence/security/law enforcement alphabet soup. They've given us insipid color coded warning systems (quick, what color is the most serious threat level?) and absurd advice (duct tape, anyone) with little to trumpet as accomplishments. So instead of fixing the problems of information flow between, say, CIA and FBI the big government urge of the Bush administration was to create another Cabinet level department that we'll never get rid of. So of course in my fantasy the alternative office would be handled better and do a thorough job of informing the American public about the threat we now face. Brian Birmingham On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:25 PM, John McCreery wrote: What if, instead of an Office of Homeland Security, the president had created an official post that developed a strategy for countering Islamism on the ideological front? Why are these posed as alternatives? Surely we can agree that both homeland security and presenting attractive alternatives to people inclined to Islamism are worthy goals. The problem is that if the implementation of ideological warfare were as stupidly clumsy and as big a threat to basic liberties as OHS already is, it, too, would provide little more than more evidence that Republicans have good reason to fear big government. They don't have a clue how to run one. =