In a message dated 5/3/2004 6:50:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time, johnwager@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > I've actually used the ERIC database for education, and even though I > would defer to your professional expertise in this area, I must say that > there's nothing particularly "educational" about its design. It's just a > big collection of indexed articles; it could be about crops, or illegal > aliens, and it would still have the same kind of data structures. So it > doesn't bother me that the database happens to be an educational one; I > would EXPECT Republicans to award contracts to their friends in high > places. This is what people vote for when they vote for Republicans. > I'm sure that the company will not do any worse job than any other > company who gets contracts based on contacts. It also doesn't surprise > me that Bush's friends tend to be armament contractors rather than > education contractors; last I looked, there is not nearly as much money > in being an education contractor as being a defense > contractor.... Thanks for your thoughts. While ERIC does compile various links and articles from a variety of sources, there IS screening being done in order to decide which links/articles will be included. (Thus the difference between ERIC and the entire world wide web which allows for [as we've all discussed before] for one search word to give you 300,000 possibilities to look at--and they are not rated according to relevancy [which ERIC and other databases do try to do...], but according to popularity of use. Kind of like the quote which says "I want to know what good is a web search engine that returns 324,909,188 'matches' to my key word. That's like saying, "Good news, we've located the product you're looking for. It's on Earth." ]quote by Bruce Cameron]. If the screening process is set up so that there is judgment not based on certain criteria of relevance to the topic based on the merits of the research(er) itself, but to the political point of view which the research points to, then you will see only links/articles purporting to be representative of all sides of an issue but not doing so in actuality. The concern on this matter matches that of what is happening in regards to the Dept of Ed's website (it follows) Thanks again for your thoughts! Marlena in Missouri (librarian at http://www.mcpl.lib.mo.us ) Censoring the Department of Education Website The Department of Education has asked employees to censor the Department™s web site based on the political priorities of the Bush Administration. In May 2002, the Department of Education circulated an internal memo entitled œCriteria & Process for Removing Old Content from www.ed.gov.[1] The memo explains that the www.ed.gov portal, the largest of the Department™s sites, lacks common design themes and navigational systems. Furthermore, it states that œ[m]uch of the content on these pages is either outdated or runs counter to current Administration priorities.[2] The memo instructs employees to remove all items dated earlier than February 2001 unless the item: Is needed for a legal reason; Supports No Child Left Behind or other Administration priorities and initiatives; Is important for historical perspective (ie: statistical trends, the Nation at Risk report); Is important for policy reasons identified by an Assistant Secretary; or Is useful or valuable to parents, students, or educators and is consistent with the Administration™s philosophy.[3] The American Educational Research Association and 12 additional national educational organizations wrote a letter to Education Secretary Rod Paige expressing concern about the suppression of information.[4] Executive Director Dr. Felice J. Levine commented, œSound policy depends on solid science . . . . We need to ensure that research materials remain accessible so that analysts can interrogate them further and compare new results with prior data. We need to resist policies or procedures that remove such information or make it difficult to find.[5] [1] Department of Education, Criteria and Process for Removing Old Content from www.ed.gov (May 31, 2002). [2] Id. (emphasis added). [3] Id. (emphasis added). [4] Letter from American Educational Research Association et al. to Secretary of Education Rod Paige (Oct. 25, 2002). [5] American Educational Research Association, AERA NEWS: Societies Raise Concerns About Document Removal from U.S. Department of Education Web Site (Nov. 21, 2002) (online at http://www.aera.net/communications/news/021121.htm). Which is: Societies Raise Concerns about Document Removal from U.S. Department of Education Web Site WASHINGTON, November 21, 2002 – The American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the American Library Association (ALA), in concert with 12 other national organizations, have joined in an effort to retain documents on the U.S. Department of Education’s Web site. In a letter to Education Secretary Rod Paige, the 14 professional organizations have requested that all U.S. Department of Education materials retain the level of accessibility now available. The groups have expressed concerns about the fate of information scheduled to be removed from the publicly accessible Web site. “Because the Internet has become, by far, the method of choice for disseminating information and research data widely and efficiently, we are concerned about efforts that would diminish access and use of these records,” they wrote. In addition, they are equally concerned about actions that would remove from access research, data, and other digests of information that otherwise have been publicly available, regardless of administration. They advocate that educational stakeholders be included in the web revamping process. The AERA/ALA-initiated effort was triggered this fall after the library, educational research and related social science communities learned of an internal memo, “Criteria and Process for Removing Old Content from www.ed.gov,” that the Education Department issued to staff members on May 31, 2002. According to the internal government memo, the federal initiative strives to remove from public access information that either is outdated or “does not reflect the priorities, philosophies, or goals of the present administration.” Dr. Felice J. Levine, AERA Executive Director, emphasizes the importance of access to research reports and data. “Sound policy depends on solid science,” she notes. “We need to ensure that research materials remain accessible so that analysts can interrogate them further and compare new results with prior data. We need to resist policies or procedures that remove such information or make it difficult to find.” “The American Library Association supports Education Secretary Paige’s effort to improve the functional usability of the Department’s Web site – by making it more user friendly to the general public,” says ALA Washington Office Executive Director Emily Sheketoff. “However, we strongly believe that education information should be continuously accessible to educators, researchers, families, and children – and must remain permanently available to the public,” she concludes. In their letter, the professional societies state, “We, as well as the general public, need Internet access to the research, data, reports, and other digests and information that may be removed from the Department’s Web site.” To read the complete text of the associations’ letter online, go to /communications/news/021025.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html