"How would you approach the economic mess if you had Obama's ear?" If I may ... I think there are two problems. Firstly how to make banks loan money again. Secondly how to hedge against the risk that they won't. However, there's a fundamental problem here: interest rates have been reduced down to nothing in the hope that it'll encourage people and businesses to use credit, and also to ease the burden of people with mortagages. Unfortunately, low interest rates do not represent an incentive for the banks to loan money so it doesn't really matter how much would be borrowed, given the low costs of doing so, if banks won't release the money anyway. In short, the standard means of market intervention as dreamed up by the neoclassical economists (Milton et al) - the adjustment of interest rates to impact the financial market - no longer applies. What's left is either the government spending money it doesn't have to initiate investment works that will boost employment and enable people to spend(Keynesianism), or the bold step of nationalising signficant portions of the financial market to ensure that the money starts flowing again (this called something else!). What Obama should do and what he will do are, I believe, two different things with the difference defined by the economic lobby he'll be forced to listen to. He should nationalise, he'll probably spend. Of course, Fukuyama (and Lawrence) are now having kittens. Simon