I meant to add that it sounded to me like the editor's war genes were expressing themselves. Over and over Hitler was the Man, the Man. Given our inability to stay out of war, no wonder I suppose. What's the difference between military and barbaric? http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/personoftheyear/archive/stories/1938.html -----Original Message----- From: Robert Paul <Robert.Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Dec 21, 2004 3:28 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Fw: Re: Disbelief >Those issues are before the war and during the war. I assume the horrors that history revealed were not documented in them.< I pointed to A. Hitler and J. Stalin's appearances in response to the suggestion that it was some sort of honor to appear on TIME'S cover as Man/Woman/Person of the year. This is a common misapprehension. But it's true that in 1942 at least, Stalin was presented favorably. I see that Stalin was on the cover twice: in 1939 (he followed Hitler) and in 1942. The 1942 story stresses the heroism of the Russian people, etc. I haven't read the other two but I'd like to see what TIME's editors had to say about Stalin in 1939. The Hitler cover isn't just a mug shot of Hitler; it's like something out of Hieronymus Bosch: http://www.time.com/time/personoftheyear/archive/covers/1938.html Someone who subscribes to TIME might retrieve the story for us (there's a link to it). Otherwise it costs $4.95. Robert Paul Reed College ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html