From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
After I read The End of History I was so struck by it that I looked for comments and reviews. I recall a criticism or an elaboration that described Fukuyama as not so much a Hegelian as a Kojevean.
This is correct. F discusses Kojeve, but then again, Kojeve was a commentator on Hegel.
Kojeve argued that it was time to give Hegel his due and admit that he was right when he argued that Capitalism, aka Liberal-Democracy, was the end of history.
Most in the globalist West would say it's good.
War will restore man to a state of dignity.
It's interesting that you think Fukuyama should have mentioned "Bultmann, Bonheoffer, Brunner ,etc." I heard Fukuyama on C-Span two or three times over the years and my impression is that he's an atheist.
Of course he's an atheist. Why would he believe in slave morality? That's for losers.
My point is that F writes about ethics, but he hasn't gotten beyond the 1800s.
he presents Hegel's idea about human nature and I can't see that he disapproves of it i.e., "that in his most essential characteristics man was undetermined and therefore free to create his own nature." [TEOH page 63]
Precisely. F is an idealist from the Enlightenment. He is discussin the Enlightenment.
Another thing: what does he mean by...
technology capitalism democracy
He use these terms in very complex ways.
Did you see the video with the two Korean kids
- andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html