On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:17, Michael Burian wrote: > Jean-Philippe Francois wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot for this. > > I don't like the IO_ADDRESS() thing, but I can live with it :) > > better ideas? Dropping it ;) More seriously, I think replacing inl(addr) with readl(IO_ADDRESS(addr)) reduces the code readability. If we had EP93XX_AHB_BASE defined as IO_BASE_VIRT, we could get rid of this IO_ADDRESS macro. JP Francois