Here is a patch to apply on top of the 2.6.11.7-ep93xx patch that:
Notes:
Hope this is useful.
Robert
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:17, Michael Burian wrote:
Jean-Philippe Francois wrote:
Thanks a lot for this. I don't like the IO_ADDRESS() thing, but I can live with it :)
better ideas?
Dropping it ;) More seriously, I think replacing inl(addr) with readl(IO_ADDRESS(addr)) reduces the code readability. If we had EP93XX_AHB_BASE defined as IO_BASE_VIRT, we could get rid of this IO_ADDRESS macro.
JP Francois
-- Robert Whaley Applied Data Systems www.applieddata.net 434-244-9504 rwhaley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx