Neil, Thanks for your comments. I'll keep them in mind for the future. For now the bold Nemeth notation seems to be best for this particular case. There are a few things that have no representation in Nemeth. For example, there is no way to handle underlined letters. Thanks, John On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:13:23PM -0700, Neil Soiffer wrote: > I don't know what the proper thing to do in Nemeth is, but the "double > struck" characters are distinct from bold. Unicode has a range of bold math > symbols starting at 1D400. The double struck chars start at 1D538, but have > holes in them because some of the characters (such as the C) were already in > Unicode. There was/is debate as to whether it was wise for Unicode to leave > the holes, but that's a different email thread. > > The point of these plane one characters is that they are semantically > distinct from the regular letters in that you may well mix various font > variants of a letter in a mathematical text and the reader is suppose to > understand that they have different meanings. This is great for > accessibility, but I'm sure Nemeth code covers them all... at least I don't > see anything appropriate listed in Appendix A of the "green" book, but that > is a pretty old book. I also don't see how Fraktur symbols are represented > in Nemeth. > > Neil > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Mike Sivill <mike.sivill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > I guess you're totally right to use the bold indicator. After reading that > > article, I understand what the letter actually looks like. Before, I > > thought > > it was like a C with a line drawn cross it twice or something. Now that I > > know it is meant to be bold, that's what it should be. One fallback of the > > unicode tables is that they sometimes use esoteric naming of characters in > > attempt at describing the character, instead of their real names. > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. > > Boyer > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:23 PM > > To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Bold Capital C > > > > Here is a private message from Susan Jolly which contains a link to an > > interesting article. In view of this, it would seem better to use the > > bold typeform for the double-struck capital C. If I remember right, this > > would be 456-6-14. Vectors should be represented by small bold letters, > > for example, 456-136 and 456-1236. > > > > John > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Susan Jolly <easjolly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ----- > > > > Subject: Double struck letters > > From: Susan Jolly <easjolly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:35:03 -0600 > > To: "'John J. Boyer'" <john.boyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi John, > > > > I thought you might find this article on the origin of double struck > > letters > > interesting. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackboard_bold > > > > My inclination would be to use the Nemeth bold capital letters rather than > > the script capital letters to distinguish these symbols. > > > > Susan > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > -- > > John J. boyer; President, Chief Software Developer > > JJB Software, Inc. > > http://www.jjb-software.com > > Madison, WI USA > > Developing software for people with disabilities > > > > For a description of the software and to download it go to > > http://www.jjb-software.com > > > > For a description of the software and to download it go to > > http://www.jjb-software.com > > -- John J. boyer; President, Chief Software Developer JJB Software, Inc. http://www.jjb-software.com Madison, WI USA Developing software for people with disabilities For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com