[LRflex] Re: article from Amateur photographer
- From: corperk@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:45:26 -0400
Hmmm, I see; Thanks Chris,
I look to hear from others...
Roberta
On Apr 19, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Chris Birchenhall wrote:
>
>
>
> Roberta
>
>
> I am afraid I can't speak for the reviewer as 'filmic' is very much a
> subjective term. Furthermore, the samples reproduced in the AP are
> not very
> high quality images leaving the reader without the means to make an
> independent assessment. The only objective measures offered in the
> article
> are the dynamic range plots (EV against brightness) supporting her
> claims
> that the Olympus has a shorter dynamic range.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> [LRflex] Re: article from Amateur photographer
>
> I would like to know what the author meant by "Images from this
> camera are most 'filmic' and less overly digital in quality".
>
> How did images appear differently from the Olympus than the other
> cameras that were rated.
> Thank you,
> Roberta
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
