[LRflex] Re: Water Spots? MORE QUESTIONS
- From: "Dave Saalsaa" <dsaalsaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 07:05:21 -0500
Actually, while the Leica DMR digital back might be more prone to dust
because it is more accessible, it is also infinitely more easy to clean
because of that accessiblilty. The more I hear about the DMR, the more I
want one. Just can't afford one at that price.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:39 AM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Water Spots? MORE QUESTIONS
> I've tried to follow the thread and read the documentation on the sorry
> "water spots" episode.
> - I come to the conclusion that digital is not the best of the worlds as
> i thought it was - with film, you had to wait until you saws your pixes,
> but dust was not such a problem, was it?
> - I also deduce that bridge with built-in lenses are better protected -
> but their uses are still limited to "standard" snaps.
> - I now have doubts about the Digital back, which should all the more be
> prone to that kind of problem as you must be very very careful when you
> adapt the back I guess (never seen one by the way)
> - I get to think that nothing's perfect and i should wait a little more
> before turning to digital.
> What do you think?
> Phileica
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
