David, I haven't heard about a B&W only sensor, but is more pixels the only thing that changes? Is the bit depth higher or the sensor more sensitive? Jonathan On 1-Jun-07, at 12:04 PM, David Young wrote: > At 01/06/2007, you wrote: >> Going back to rumors: >> do you have any clue about a digital M b&w only sensor? >> There was something in Luminous Landscape some months ago and was >> really >> intriguing. A Kodak camera already is around and the way pixels are >> used to >> create the picture were promising astonish resolution, if I correctly >> remember. >> Flavio > > Hi Flavio: > > When we were in Wetzlar, last fall, Tom A. asked Steven Lee (at a > public dinner) about the B&W M8, and was told it should be out in > (last) April. I gather the only change is in the firmware, but the > way they interpret the image should yield an "effective" 17mp > image.... which is significantly more impressive than simply removing > the colour from the 10 mp image. > > However, when that statement was made, they had not yet released the > M8 and were not aware of either [a] the demand for the product and > [b] the amount of work doing the recall of the first run of > cameras. Both have consumed way more capacity than they > thought. Thus, I am pretty sure that the B&W M8 is "on the back > burner" ... a project to get around to, when they have time. > > Sorry, but I have no information which is more up to date. > > Cheers! > > > --- > > David Young, > Logan Lake, CANADA > > Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ > Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt > Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/