Hi People, I'm measuring all my Minolta lenses to see which are a potential problem with the EOS 1ds Mk II. And although I'm not sure how this relates to the topic I have to tell you ....I have to tell someone since my wife yawns and can't take her eyes off her Maeve Binchy novels when I try to tell her .....that I now have two 55mm Micro Nikkor 28mm lenses...one for my old Nikon Photomic Ftn (that I rarely use) and one for my Eos 1Ds Mk II that I use a lot. This lens is becoming my favorite. It's just phenomenal. I was using the Summicron 50mm but I think the Nikon's better. A lens that I almost invariably reach for when I can take only one lens. It's Sooooo sharp! Great bokeh! Wow! Harry ---- Dave Saalsaa <dsaalsaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course the other way to handle it is just not focus to infinity. Put a > limiter on the focus ring. Shoot stopped down enough for hyperfocal depth > of field. Not too difficult with a 24mm lens. > > Dave > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Pinkerton" <gpinkcp@xxxxxxx> > To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:49 PM > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in anticipation > > > > Google variations of ''dremel tool leica lens modification Canon 5'' and > > you'll come up with some things on the Fred Miranda site as well as others > > [scary stuff, but several folks have done it] > > > > > >>From: "Dave Saalsaa" <dsaalsaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in > >>anticipation > >>Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:35:21 -0500 > >> > >>I don't know, Philippe as I don't own a 5D to measure. I do remember > >>reading somewhere on the net that the 5D had much more limitations because > >>of the larger mirror so less lens clearance. One gentleman shaved his 5D > >>mirror with a dremel tool to regain the proper clearance. How he did it > >>without introducing lots of dust particles into the camera is a mystery > >>to > >>me. > >> > >>Dave > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:14 PM > >>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in > >>anticipation > >> > >> > >> > Thanks Dave, > >> > precious information here too. > >> > > >> > If I go 5D, I won't need to buy new lenses from third parties as , > >> > provided they fit onto the 5D, I'll be keeping my pets at their > >> > original > >> > focal length.. > >> > But you're telling me the 5D won't take the 24mm , this is already a > >> > severe limitation on my plan :-( . Douglas our Birdman seemed to think > >> > Canon bodies would take any lens that the SL does. The 24mm must be on > >> > that list. This is why I need to know precidely the value of the > >> > clearance/gap left by the mirror when it tilts either way. If anyone on > >> > the list has got a Canon D and a jauge, please let me know the value > >> > you > >> > have measured (i.e. I am certainly asking the impossible on the wrong > >> > list :-[ > >> > > >> > Thank all for your patience, dedicaton to problem solving, usw. > >> > Yours > >> > Philippe > >> > > >> > Dave Saalsaa wrote: > >> > > >> >>One thing to note, Philippe, The 5D being a full frame sensor with > >>larger > >> >>mirror cannot take the EF-S type lenses like the Tokina 12-24. Also > >>the > >> >>Leica 24mm Elmarit will not work with the 5 D because of mirror > >>clearance > >> >>issues. > >> >> > >> >>Dave > >> >>----- Original Message ----- > >> >>From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:52 AM > >> >>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in > >> >>anticipation > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>>Thanks Javier, Dave et al. > >> >>>5D : erratum - less expensive than used to be after all, and no > >>cropping > >> >>>factor if I understand it alright. More, I could then still play with > >>my > >> >>>pets. > >> >>> > >> >>>Tokina is yet another fine option I've also considered - not bad at > >>all > >> >>>as repeatedly stated here, except perhaps for colour, which can be > >> >>>adjusted in the digital lab :-) > >> >>>My source : tokina test > >> >>><http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/tokina_1224_4/index.htm> > >> >>> > >> >>>Thanks again everyone for the many contributions. > >> >>>More is welcome if you have afterthoughts or breaking news to share as > >> >>>there is more in a List than in one head, isn't there? > >> >>>Also, wating for Photokina to be over as advised too. > >> >>> > >> >>>Yours > >> >>>Phileicangenieux. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>Dave Saalsaa wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>>I have the Tokina 12 to 24mm zoom which is not mediocre at all. It is > >> >>>>one > >> >>>>of > >> >>>>the best lenses I have in wide angle type. The resolution of this > >>lens > >> >>>>is > >> >>>>simply amazing. > >> >>>> > >> >>>>Dave > >> >>>>----- Original Message ----- > >> >>>>From: "Javier Perez" <summarex@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >>>>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:20 AM > >> >>>>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in > >> >>>>anticipation > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>>I would suggest you go for a full frame 5d or a used > >> >>>>>1ds, if you want to take advantage of the Zeiss and > >> >>>>>Leitz wide angles. The most annoying thing about > >> >>>>>reduced format digital SLRs is having to use those > >> >>>>>ultrawide and usually mediocre lenses just to get the > >> >>>>>view you might from a fine 25 or 28. > >> >>>>>Javier > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>__________________________________________________ > >> >>>>>Do You Yahoo!? > >> >>>>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> >>>>>http://mail.yahoo.com > >> >>>>>------ > >> >>>>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > >> >>>>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >> >>>>>Archives are at: > >> >>>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>------ > >> >>>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > >> >>>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >> >>>>Archives are at: > >> >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>------ > >> >>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > >> >>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >> >>>Archives are at: > >> >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >>------ > >> >>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > >> >> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >> >>Archives are at: > >> >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > ------ > >> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > >> > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >> > Archives are at: > >> > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > >> > > >> > >> > >>------ > >>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > >> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >>Archives are at: > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > > > ------ > > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > > Archives are at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/