[LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in anticipation

  • From: <badgerhill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:04:55 -0700

Hi People,
I'm measuring all my Minolta lenses to see which are a potential problem with 
the EOS 1ds Mk II. And although I'm not sure how this relates to the topic I 
have to tell you ....I have to tell someone since my wife yawns and can't take 
her eyes off her Maeve Binchy novels when I try to tell her .....that I now 
have two  55mm Micro Nikkor 28mm lenses...one for my old Nikon Photomic Ftn 
(that I rarely use) and one for my Eos 1Ds Mk II that I use a lot. This lens is 
becoming my favorite. It's just phenomenal. I was using the Summicron 50mm but 
I think the Nikon's better. A lens that I almost invariably reach for when I 
can take only one lens. It's Sooooo sharp! Great bokeh! Wow!

Harry


---- Dave Saalsaa <dsaalsaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Of course the other way to handle it is just not focus to infinity.  Put a 
> limiter on the focus ring.  Shoot stopped down enough for hyperfocal depth 
> of field.  Not too difficult with a 24mm lens.
> 
> Dave
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary Pinkerton" <gpinkcp@xxxxxxx>
> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:49 PM
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in anticipation
> 
> 
> > Google variations of ''dremel tool leica lens modification Canon 5'' and
> > you'll come up with some things on the Fred Miranda site as well as others
> > [scary stuff, but several folks have done it]
> >
> >
> >>From: "Dave Saalsaa" <dsaalsaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in
> >>anticipation
> >>Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:35:21 -0500
> >>
> >>I don't know, Philippe as I don't own a 5D to measure.   I do remember
> >>reading somewhere on the net that the 5D had much more limitations because
> >>of the larger mirror so less lens clearance.  One gentleman shaved his 5D
> >>mirror with a dremel tool to regain the proper clearance.  How he did it
> >>without introducing lots of  dust particles into the camera is a mystery 
> >>to
> >>me.
> >>
> >>Dave
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:14 PM
> >>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in
> >>anticipation
> >>
> >>
> >> > Thanks Dave,
> >> > precious information here too.
> >> >
> >> > If I go 5D, I won't need to buy new lenses from third parties as ,
> >> > provided they fit onto the 5D, I'll be keeping my pets at their 
> >> > original
> >> > focal length..
> >> > But you're telling me the 5D won't  take the 24mm , this is already a
> >> > severe limitation on my plan :-( . Douglas our Birdman seemed to think
> >> > Canon bodies would take any lens that the SL does. The 24mm must be on
> >> > that list. This is why I need to know precidely the value of the
> >> > clearance/gap left by the mirror when it tilts either way. If anyone on
> >> > the list has got a Canon D and a jauge, please let me know the value 
> >> > you
> >> > have measured (i.e. I am certainly asking the impossible on the wrong
> >> > list :-[
> >> >
> >> > Thank all for your patience, dedicaton to problem solving, usw.
> >> > Yours
> >> > Philippe
> >> >
> >> > Dave Saalsaa wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>One thing to note, Philippe,  The 5D being a full frame sensor with
> >>larger
> >> >>mirror cannot take the EF-S type lenses like the  Tokina 12-24.  Also
> >>the
> >> >>Leica 24mm Elmarit will not work with the 5 D because of mirror
> >>clearance
> >> >>issues.
> >> >>
> >> >>Dave
> >> >>----- Original Message -----
> >> >>From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:52 AM
> >> >>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in
> >> >>anticipation
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>Thanks Javier, Dave et al.
> >> >>>5D : erratum - less expensive than used to be after all, and no
> >>cropping
> >> >>>factor if I understand it alright. More, I could then still play with
> >>my
> >> >>>pets.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Tokina is yet another fine option I've also considered  - not bad at
> >>all
> >> >>>as repeatedly stated here, except perhaps for colour, which can be
> >> >>>adjusted in the digital lab :-)
> >> >>>My source : tokina test
> >> >>><http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/tokina_1224_4/index.htm>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Thanks again everyone for the many contributions.
> >> >>>More is welcome if you have afterthoughts or breaking news to share as
> >> >>>there is more in a List than in one head, isn't there?
> >> >>>Also, wating for Photokina to be over as advised too.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Yours
> >> >>>Phileicangenieux.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Dave Saalsaa wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>I have the Tokina 12 to 24mm zoom which is not mediocre at all. It is
> >> >>>>one
> >> >>>>of
> >> >>>>the best lenses I have in wide angle type.  The resolution of this
> >>lens
> >> >>>>is
> >> >>>>simply amazing.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Dave
> >> >>>>----- Original Message -----
> >> >>>>From: "Javier Perez" <summarex@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>>>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:20 AM
> >> >>>>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in
> >> >>>>anticipation
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>I would suggest you go for a full frame 5d or a used
> >> >>>>>1ds, if you want to take advantage of the Zeiss and
> >> >>>>>Leitz wide angles. The most annoying thing about
> >> >>>>>reduced format digital SLRs is having to use those
> >> >>>>>ultrawide and usually mediocre lenses just to get the
> >> >>>>>view you might from a fine 25 or 28.
> >> >>>>>Javier
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>__________________________________________________
> >> >>>>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >>>>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >>>>>http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >>>>>------
> >> >>>>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >> >>>>>  http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >> >>>>>Archives are at:
> >> >>>>>  //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>------
> >> >>>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >> >>>>   http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >> >>>>Archives are at:
> >> >>>>   //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>------
> >> >>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >> >>>   http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >> >>>Archives are at:
> >> >>>   //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>------
> >> >>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >> >>    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >> >>Archives are at:
> >> >>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ------
> >> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >> >    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >> > Archives are at:
> >> >    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>------
> >>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >>Archives are at:
> >>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >
> >
> > ------
> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> > Archives are at:
> >    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> > 
> 
> 
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: