[LRflex] Re: Going digital - Advice sought - Thanks in anticipation
- From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 07:29:56 +0200
Thanks Douglas
Angenieux don't protrude so much as the Elmarit, seems like it could be
safe then.
I'm not sure the 350D would take the 24mm, looks so small, but cute too.
Thanks again.
Yours
Phileicangenieux.
Douglas Herr wrote:
>On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Philippe Amard wrote:
>
>
>
>>Do you know of any case of D20 or D30 that got stuck because of
>>Elmarit24, Angenieux(s) or extender?
>>
>>
>
>The extender will not be a problem. Following my rule-of-thumb,
>anything that has enough clearance for the SL has enough for any Canon.
> This means that any leica extender is fine on any Canon body. I
>expect that the 20D and 30D mirror is small enough that the 24mm
>Elmarit-R won't be a problem; I know nothign about the Angenieux lenses
>but if they fit on the SL and have adequate mirror clearance for this
>camera they too will work on the Canon bodies.
>
>Doug Herr
>Birdman of Sacramento
>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
