Thanks Gary - there was no hurry you know ;-) The result is clearly up to the previous photos' standard - on top of the understandingly positive remarks already posted to which i couldn't agree more, I find the light really finely captured, even though the heavier original file must be telling much more of course - what i find excellent is the rendition of the second bolder with the lychen -first one slightly out of focus?) - the tops of the sunlit trees in the distance seem slightly burnt out, but who would have expected to do better on film? - very nice composition too; for a near point and shoot shot congratulation on your gear (we have to admit this even on a leica list) and on your eye ;-) Phileicangenieux PS: plus one about FILO vs FIFO in the posting Gary Todoroff wrote: >>-----Original Message----- Behalf Of Philippe Amard >>Hi Gary - congratulations as usual - these snaps are smashing >> >>one remark though - I notice that the gist of your snaps results from >>the "shiny", "glossy" side of the pixes. And I do like them as afore >>said, but ... >> >>i'd like to see some landscapes where softer tones are involved, or >>nature at least - I went for a "walk by the canal" . . . >> >> >> > >Ok, Philippe, I found the closest thing we have to a canal around here and >included a landscape photo at the end of the Lympa Log today. That 7-11mm >zoom is some lens! Had a couple of Leica lenses in the bag but that >ultrawide was just too much fun while the light lasted! > >Gary Todoroff >http://www.northcoastphotos.com/Lympa.htm >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/291 - Release Date: 3/24/2006 > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/