[klaatumail] Re: Fwd: Fw: How Big is Walmart?

  • From: Jaimie Vernon <bullseyecanada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:21:35 -0400

And OJ Simpson was innocent too!

Jaimie Vernon,
Contribute funds to my completed 3rd solo album!
http://www.kapipal.com/jaimievernon

Author, Canadian Pop Music Encyclopedia
http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Pop_Encyclopedia/
http://www.bullseyesongs.com/encyclopedia.html

PERSONAL - http://www.myspace.com/jaimievernonsmovingtargetz
                - http://radio3.cbc.ca/bands/Jaimie-Vernon
BLOG - http://verminator.livejournal.com
FACEBOOK - http://www.facebook.com/jaimievernon



 
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:24:04 -0700
> From: wesdym@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [klaatumail] Re: Fwd: Fw: How Big is Walmart?
> To: klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> From: Jaimie Vernon <bullseyecanada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 12:15:13 PM
> Subject: [klaatumail] Re: Fwd: Fw: How Big is Walmart?
> 
> Why does radio play Billy Preston & Michael Jackson (both pedophiles) or Cat 
> Stevens (a proven supporter of Middle Eastern terrorists)?
> 
> 
> Whoa, whoa, whoa.
> 
> For the record, neither Preston or Jackson were ever convicted of 
> paedophilia. 
> Further, the clinical definition refers strictly to pre-pubescent children. 
> Both 
> were accused of inappropriate conduct with or towards older kids. In the case 
> of 
> Preston, the kids would be legal adults in many parts of the world, and have 
> some of the rights of adults even in many parts of North America. Younger, in 
> the case of Jackson, but still above the clinically defined age range of 
> paedophiles. Call it what you want, but it's not proven and whether or not it 
> is 
> it's not paedophilia regardless. Psychology professor J. Michael Bailey 
> (Northwestern Univ.) has speculated that Jackson had a complex of 
> paraphilias, 
> including hebephilia (an attraction to pubescent youth), which is distinctly 
> different.
> 
> Regardless, to lay the charge is to declare conviction, and I don't believe 
> any 
> of us can do that.
> 
> Cat Stevens, as Yusuf Islam, is a devout Muslim teaching in London, who has 
> repeatedly disclaimed violence in the name of religion (or any other reason), 
> issued a statement of sympathy following 9/11 (also expressly disclaiming 
> Islamic violence), performed "Peace Train" at the Concert for New York City, 
> and 
> donated a portion of proceeds from a later release to victims' families. He 
> was 
> denied entry to the U.S. on suspicion of supporting Hamas (based on 
> never-validated charges by Israel), but it's likely this was due to someone 
> else 
> having a similar name. He successfully sued British media who claimed he 
> supported terrorism. Those charges have never been "proven" by anyone, 
> anywhere.
> 
> There's a world of difference between suspicion and conviction, and I don't 
> just 
> mean in the legal sense.
> 
> 
> 
                                          

Other related posts: