Re: JAWS and "latest & greatest" video cards
- From: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:59:50 -0500
yes, to a point. The bottleneck is the speech synthesizer. 2g of ram will
give you good results too with a 64mb card that is not so fast.
----- Original Message -----
From: "trouble" <trouble1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: JAWS and "latest & greatest" video cards
The faster the graphics get processed the less buffer time is on jaws. The
computer that the test was on had on board video of 32mb and the card was
on board 64mb ram. More speech with the card because of its ram then did
with on board. Just to prove my theory I used another card with the same
ram as the on board and the difference was back to crap speech output. Its
not text jaws is picking up on but the graphic resolutions handles. You can
make jaws speak the text only if you can use functions in scripts like say
line, word or string. But when it has the handle of that graphic window the
speech is almost straight out put. The msn messenger 6 would be able to use
this except the window is black on black therefor no text to find in the
graphic.
At 08:09 AM 1/13/04 -0500, you wrote:
>trouble is incorrect. The rate of the video has nothing to do with jaws
>performance except perhaps that it might be too quick.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tusing" <ptusing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:17 AM
>Subject: Re: JAWS and "latest & greatest" video cards
>
>
>Thanks to all, As "Trouble" said,
>" Jaws reads graphics to determine what to say to us. Make those graphics
> > speed up and you got a hot jaws and more that reads then you ever heard.
>So *only* A T I9700 users please write me *but not not here*.
>And I mean not here.
>It can be tricky "learning" enough about the latest and greatest in
terms
>of hardware that will work. Thanks again.
>
>
>
> > At 07:47 PM 1/12/04 -0500, you wrote:
> > >HI,
> > >Suppose there is a video card likethe ATI 9000 pro which has been
> > >around for awhile and
> > >the ATI 9700 video card which is relative new and is about 30% faster
>even
> > >in 2 d:
> > >is using the newer video card "more likely" to have problems using
>JAWS?
> > >In other words, should one wait aroundforvideocards to "age" abit and
>thus
> > >sacrifice speed for more guaranteed JAWS usage?
> > >People can answer off list and I would cut and paste answers ifthat
> > >wouldsave list traffic.
> > >thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> >
> > Tim
> > trouble
> >
> > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> >
>
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Tim
trouble
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
