Hi,I was a Dectalk user for years, and am a little amused that the software version of Dectalk these days sounds vaguely Indian, not so much in the pronunciation but the voice's lilt.
As for Karen, Tom and Lee, I like all three, but I wouldn't use them for anything other than a long say-all. One of my students recently joked that he now has a thing about Karen and wants to leave his wife and fly down to Australia to find her.
Tom----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Midence" <alex.midence@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:42 PM Subject: Re: Different behavior between RealSpeak voices
Hi, The most responsive sapi 5 voice I have found is e-speak which is, most unfortunately, not available for Jaws for some reason. E-speak is not what you could call natural-sounding. It sounds horrid, actually. None of the natural-sounding voices are going to be responsive because they are too cumbersome since their goal is not responsiveness but, rather, to mimic the quality you get from a human reader as closely as possible. They are used by automated phone systems, talking caller id's, public transportation announcements, and other things. With Jaws, I use the sapi 5 voices during say all when I am reading a book or a long webpage or something like that. To me, the best balance between clarity and responsiveness is still and probably always will be Dec talk. If I remember correctly, Jaws does support all flavors of it. It doesn't sound human but the pronunciation is just amazing. Acclaimed physicist Steven Hawking used it as his voice for communicating with people for years and years. You can still hear it on the weather channel from time to time too. Always get a kick out of that one. The different voices sound more pleasant too. No shivers, quavers, or shakes like you get in the natural sounding voices. Very smooth and very clear right up to several hundred words per minute. Do that with Samantha and she sounds like a cross between a goat and an opera singer being violently shaken. Incidentally, my personal favorite sapi 5 voice is Karen. An absolute pleasure to listen to and the accent falls very nicely on the ear. After that, I'd say I like Tom the best trailed by Lee as the third. Personal preference. Alex M On 8/10/10, Yadiel <yadosotomayor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Yes! Although I prefer jill. "She" sounds... well... in lack of a betterphrase, more sweet and plecent to the ear. Although, not as responsive. Infact, I yet haven't found a voice that is as responsive as I would like. Real Speak Solo direct or sappy 5, I still can't find a good soundingresponsive voice. That is why I use eloquence for most of my task includingweb surfing and use the real speak and sappy 5s for reading very long documents. Yadiel -------------------------------------------------- From: "Dale E. Heltzer" <deheltzer@xxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 8:47 PM To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Different behavior between RealSpeak voicesSome days ago I posted about how RealSpeak Daniel doesn't always pronounce words the way they're written. I've been using Samantha, and have noticed no such shortcomings - and "she" is much more responsive than Daniel. Anyone else notice this? --- Dale E. Heltzer deheltzer@xxxxxxx -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw Alternative archives located at: http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw Alternative archives located at: http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.htmlIf you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact thelist owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.comJFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfwAlternative archives located at: http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.htmlIf you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw Alternative archives located at: http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx