RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW Clients
- From: "Jim Harrison" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:49:34 -0800
All of the documentation I've seen for W2K (resource kit, help files, KB's,
etc.) suggest that if you have the option, you should place all your routes
in RRAS. None of them ever stated that you should install RRAS just to use
it for static routes, just that if it is installed, then any routing
maintenance you perform should be in RRAS, as opposed to the "route"
command.
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/authors/harrison/
----- Original Message -----
From: <Thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 09:20
Subject: [isalist] RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW
Clients
http://www.ISAserver.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 05:33 PM 11/28/2001, you wrote:
>http://www.ISAserver.org
>
>
>If you have a routed network, then you need to look at:
>http://www.isaserver.org/pages/tutorials/isanetworks.htm
I have a routing Q re this...
I can create the classless route as described in the article, and
everything works fine. My ISA box is a VPN server as well, so RRAS is
installed.
A "route print" shows the classless route added via the "route -p add blah
blah blah" under its "persistent" routes.
However, when I go to RRAS admin, it is not under "static" routes. When I
look at the routing table via RRAS, it shows the aforementioned route under
"Network Management" as the protocol.
RRAS allows me to create what it calls a "static" route (in addition to the
one added via "route -p add"), in which case it then shows up as a "static"
route, and in the routing table, it then lists both: the "route -p add" as
"Network Management" and the RRAS "static" route as "Internal
LAN". Further, a subsequent "route print" still shows the original "route
- -p add" route in "persistent" and the one added via RRAS it up in the
"Active Routes" section.
So, after all of that, my Q is, what is the difference? Should it be in
both places? What is the significance of what RRAS sees as a "static" route
if if works as a "persistent" route? Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1
iQA/AwUBPAe/7IhsmyD15h5gEQL2HgCglrXyyBUIet1N4TTPWZZ1r2SX+sYAoO32
mr84T5EpH+r/gSLaZkIvS7Qd
=BDdE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
