Re: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW Clients
- From: "Jim Harrison" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:07:29 -0800
A host with a default route to the ISA via its default gateway becomes a
secureNAT client. If you don't want them to become secureNAT, don't point
their default gateways to the ISA server.
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Carroll" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 04:08
Subject: [isalist] Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW Clients
http://www.ISAserver.org
On pg400 of Tom's book (ISA Server 2000) he says "you should not
configure your firewall clients with a default gateway" (last sentence
above "NOTE")
Can anyone comment on what would be the downside of doing this - is it
because of a performance or security issue?
Nigel
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
