RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW Clients
- From: "Muqeem Syed" <Syed.Muqeem@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:03:28 +0200
logically speaking if you want to ensure that you rusers do no tbypass
the ISA server to access internet then i guess the best way to ensure
that they have only one way out of the internet and this one way could
be monitored. through the ISA server configuration.There could be more
reasons to this, but thats what I can think of for now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Carroll [mailto:nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:08 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW
Clients
http://www.ISAserver.org
On pg400 of Tom's book (ISA Server 2000) he says "you should not
configure your firewall clients with a default gateway" (last sentence
above "NOTE")
Can anyone comment on what would be the downside of doing this - is it
because of a performance or security issue?
Nigel
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
syed.muqeem@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
