RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW Clients
- From: Thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:20:44 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 05:33 PM 11/28/2001, you wrote:
>http://www.ISAserver.org
>
>
>If you have a routed network, then you need to look at:
>http://www.isaserver.org/pages/tutorials/isanetworks.htm
I have a routing Q re this...
I can create the classless route as described in the article, and
everything works fine. My ISA box is a VPN server as well, so RRAS is
installed.
A "route print" shows the classless route added via the "route -p add blah
blah blah" under its "persistent" routes.
However, when I go to RRAS admin, it is not under "static" routes. When I
look at the routing table via RRAS, it shows the aforementioned route under
"Network Management" as the protocol.
RRAS allows me to create what it calls a "static" route (in addition to the
one added via "route -p add"), in which case it then shows up as a "static"
route, and in the routing table, it then lists both: the "route -p add" as
"Network Management" and the RRAS "static" route as "Internal
LAN". Further, a subsequent "route print" still shows the original "route
- -p add" route in "persistent" and the one added via RRAS it up in the
"Active Routes" section.
So, after all of that, my Q is, what is the difference? Should it be in
both places? What is the significance of what RRAS sees as a "static" route
if if works as a "persistent" route? Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1
iQA/AwUBPAe/7IhsmyD15h5gEQL2HgCglrXyyBUIet1N4TTPWZZ1r2SX+sYAoO32
mr84T5EpH+r/gSLaZkIvS7Qd
=BDdE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
