[isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
- From: "Young, Gerald G" <Gerald.Young@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:50:20 -0500
Oh, joy.
Injury on top of insult here. Now, instead of just a man ripping off
his clothes, you add the image of said man performing the badger dance -
and the mushroom and the snake? I don't want to even go there.
Cordially yours,
Jerry G. Young II
MCSE (4.0/W2K)
Atlanta EES Implementation Team Lead
ECNS Microsoft Engineering
Unisys
11493 Sunset Hills Rd.
Reston, VA 20190
Office: 703-579-2727
Cell: 703-625-1468
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
and its attachments from all computers.
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:19 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why did you create such an image?
As punishment:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/badgers.php
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
-----Original Message-----
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neil Cassidy
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:30 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
Like he needs another excuse to run into a phone booth and rip his
clothes off....
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 2:33 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
That would make Jim "Superman of Firewalls"!
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neil Cassidy
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:03 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
The "Clark Kent" of firewalls....
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:11 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
Normally mild mannered? :)
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:44 AM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
An impressive outburst from the normally mild mannered
TWS. Enjoyed it immensely!
JB
On Wednesday, June 21, 2006, at 08:05 AM, Thomas W
Shinder wrote:
Hi EM,
You are right. PIX is not very secure. It's a
router with some advanced ACLs and does neat routing tricks. But when it
comes to security, you're very very wrong that it's more secure.
Hardware doesn't fall from heaven, and all "hardware" is controlled by
software, and Syphco's core compentancy is not application protection --
it's routing and switching.
I agree that there is no comparison between PIX
and ISA -- only a fool would be convinced that they get any real
security from a PIX, becuase they never took the time to learn about
network security and what the end game was. Check Point? That's another
story.
Other related posts:
