[isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
- From: "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:10:11 -0500
http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------
:)
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:19 PM
> To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
>
> http://www.ISAserver.org
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Actually, I believe the subject line was mistyped:
> "PIX is secure like nothing"
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Harrison
> MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
> http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/
> http://isatools.org
> Read the help / books / articles!
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 09:11
> To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
>
> Normally mild mannered? :)
>
> Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
> Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
> Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
> Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> MVP
> -- ISA Firewalls
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Becker
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:44 AM
> To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isalist] Re: Nothing is secure like PIX
>
>
> An impressive outburst from the normally mild mannered
> TWS. Enjoyed it immensely!
>
> JB
> On Wednesday, June 21, 2006, at 08:05 AM, Thomas W
> Shinder wrote:
>
>
> Hi EM,
> You are right. PIX is not very secure. It's a
> router with some advanced ACLs and does neat routing tricks.
> But when it comes to security, you're very very wrong that
> it's more secure. Hardware doesn't fall from heaven, and all
> "hardware" is controlled by software, and Syphco's core
> compentancy is not application protection -- it's routing and
> switching.
> I agree that there is no comparison between PIX
> and ISA -- only a fool would be convinced that they get any
> real security from a PIX, becuase they never took the time to
> learn about network security and what the end game was. Check
> Point? That's another story.
>
>
>
> All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
> ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
> ISA Server Articles and Tutorials:
> http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
> ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
> http://www.techgenix.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
> Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
