Okay so with the exception of EULA and MSDN agreement lingos, there isn't any difference between RTM and MSDN versions of ISA 2004. Great!! Steve Moffat <steve@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:http://www.ISAserver.org Nah Jim....Timmy's correct!!!!!...:)) -----Original Message----- From: Jim Harrison [mailto:Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:37 AM To: ISA Mailing List Subject: [isalist] Re: Difference between MSDN version and RTM version of ISA 2004 http://www.ISAserver.org AAAAAaaaauuuuugggghhhhh! Tony got to Timmy! Intervention!!!!!! :-) -----Original Message----- From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 1:01 AM To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] Re: Difference between MSDN version and RTM version of ISA 2004 http://www.ISAserver.org Actually, the key word was "caveat" used in conjunction with "many." The use of "development" would be second in emphasis. And I said MCP's or Channel Partners (or anyone else who may buy or qualify for a Universal Subscription). I didn't say MVP or MSD. I shall elaborate: --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page