[indaemed] Re: Re NMS
- From: USM Bish <bish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: indaemed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:50:49 +0530
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:55:16AM +1300, Pooshan Navathe wrote:
>
> I read that he had a second provoked syncope at some stage.
> That was what Sudhanshu mentioned.
The problem is, info on this case is comimg piece-meal from
different sources, and what I gathered initially was based on
the posts here of Hypoxia induced LOC. Discussions on Doughal's
list also went in the same direction.
Unless we have an accurate chronological account of events, it
is becoming increasingly difficult to say things for certain.
From Jain's post yesterday it seems that even concurrent
physical unfitness at the time of the first syncopal episode
was apparently not fully excluded. Where do we proceed then ?
I repeat, it would be nice if somebody fully aware of the case
can jot down the salient findings in chronological order,
otherwise we will keep on beating around the bush, and a little
more fact would emerge.
> The other comment which Anuj made, "It would be worth
> remembering that if this cadet did have a VVS as an independent
> occurence, he could be prone for other reflex neural phenomenon
> as well" is I think very relevant.
Proneness to anything is NOT a factor that we consider in
medical disposals. Just hard facts and figures. If we get at
this game, I wonder how many people we would ground for
accident proneness, or get-home-itis predisposition ?
>
[Rest snipped]
>
Bish
--
:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Wg Cdr (Retd) US Mohalanobish bish@xxxxxxxxxxx
GF-01, Carleston Classic usmbish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
03, Carleston Road +91-80-30611448
Cooke Town, Bangalore - 560005 98451-71863 (Mobile)
----------------------------[http://geocities.com/usmbish/]--
:
Other related posts:
