John Esak wrote: "It [his work wireless internet connection] is using simple WPA and whenever it asks me for the key, I put it in and it just does not connect." WPA is the problem. Icon only supports WEP, unless this was changed before we got to version 1.06.21. John ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Esak" <john@xxxxxxxxx> To: <icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 3:09 PM Subject: [icon-discuss] Re: interesting wireless experience >I don't want to add this note to make it sound as if Icon has more problems > with wireless than any unit of any kind would anywhere. It is and has > been > just great for me at dozens of places. However, I called Michael last > week > with the main wireless system at my new place of work... it simply will > not > connect to this system. It is using simple WPA and whenever it asks me for > the key, I put it in and it just does not connect. Can't rmember if it > says > bad key or something. Michael suggested that Icon has had some trouble > with > Enterprise WPA whatever that is... and it could be that this is what our > system is using. I've only been able to talk with the network support guy, > not the main system designer... and it is a big very heterogeneous system. > I'll let everyone know if the Icon can ever get past the encryption on > this > one network... because, I as I'm sure everyone else too would like the > unit > to always connect to whatever is available and accessible. > > John > > > -----Original Message----- > From: icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jenny Axler > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:41 AM > To: icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [icon-discuss] Re: interesting wireless experience > > I've never gotten the McDonalds connections to work either, but, it should > be noted that I've had trouble with other devices too. I don't know > what's > up with them, but they're just difficult ot use in general. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul Henrichsen <mailto:paulh52@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:44 PM > Subject: [icon-discuss] interesting wireless experience > > > Hi, guys. > > Well, I decided to try using my braille plus outside the house to > see if I could connect wirelessly. We went to our local McDonalds where > they > have wayport, which I guess is part of AT&T WiFi. > > No matter what I tried, connecting through AT&T WiFi, or wayport, > which is the correct way, the braille plus could not connect. Once it got > a > failure to connect message, One could not turn the wireless off or on. > Going > into the status menu and arrowing down > > To the wireless status locked the unit up. The only way to get > things back was to remove the battery. Pressing pound star and program one > did no good. > > I believe the signal strengths were between 35 and 54 percent, but > they fluctuated a bit. > > We decided to go to a starbucks to see what would happen there. The > braille plus found the T-mobile WiFi and connected. I was able to bring up > the T-mobile web page. > > We decided to try another McDonalds on the way home. We had the same > results. We could get no connection either to AT&T WiFi or to the proper > wayport connection. > > The unit would lock up. Going into the web page did no good at all. > Once, I was told I was resetting after pressing the appropriate three > keys, > but there were no vibrations and on trying a power off, I got a power off > error. > > I again had to remove the battery and reinsert it to get things > working again. > > It seems that there is something odd with wayport and the braille > plus. > > I want to try a Barnes and Noble this weekend as they have wayport > as well. I am wondering if their router will have a stronger signal > strength. > > But I wonder why there is so much trouble with wayport? > > > > Paul Henrichsen > > paulh52@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Kurzweil 1000 Technical Support Engineer > > (800) 894-5374 > > Press 5 then 2 > > or: (888) 995-9905 > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 2904 (20080227) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1299 - Release Date: > 2/26/2008 9:08 AM > > > > > > __________ NOD32 2906 (20080227) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > >