[icon-discuss] Re: interesting wireless experience

  • From: "Pratik Patel" <pratikp1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:40:52 -0500

Sometimes there are hardware limitations that no amount of driver revisions
can fix.  Enterprise WPA encryption may be one of them for this 802.11B
chip.

-----Original Message-----
From: icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Esak
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:43 PM
To: icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [icon-discuss] Re: interesting wireless experience

Ah, thank you very much.  I should have thought of that.

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert Carter
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 6:00 PM
> To: icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [icon-discuss] Re: interesting wireless experience
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The University where I work has Enterprise WPA as well. This is a
> completely different version of WPA that the Icon does not support.
> Our system also has a guest account which allows me to log in with
> the Icon using an ID and password. You might investigate this option
> as an alternative.
>
> Robert Carter
>
> At 02:09 PM 2/27/2008, you wrote:
> >I don't want to add this note to make it sound as if Icon has
> more problems
> >with wireless than any unit of any kind would anywhere.  It is
> and has been
> >just great for me at dozens of places.  However, I called
> Michael last week
> >with the main wireless system at my new place of work... it
> simply will not
> >connect to this system. It is using simple WPA and whenever it
> asks me for
> >the key, I put it in and it just does not connect.  Can't
> rmember if it says
> >bad key or something.  Michael suggested that Icon has had some
> trouble with
> >Enterprise WPA whatever that is... and it could be that this is what our
> >system is using. I've only been able to talk with the network
> support guy,
> >not the main system designer... and it is a big very
> heterogeneous system.
> >I'll let everyone know if the Icon can ever get past the
> encryption on this
> >one network... because, I as I'm sure everyone else too would
> like the unit
> >to always connect to whatever is available and accessible.
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:icon-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jenny Axler
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:41 AM
> >To: icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [icon-discuss] Re: interesting wireless experience
> >
> >I've never gotten the McDonalds connections to work either, but,
> it should
> >be noted that I've had trouble with other devices too.  I don't
> know what's
> >up with them, but they're just difficult ot use in general.
> >
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: Paul Henrichsen <mailto:paulh52@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >         To: icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >         Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:44 PM
> >         Subject: [icon-discuss] interesting wireless experience
> >
> >
> >         Hi, guys.
> >
> >         Well, I decided to try using my braille plus outside
> the house to
> >see if I could connect wirelessly. We went to our local
> McDonalds where they
> >have wayport, which I guess is part of AT&T WiFi.
> >
> >         No matter what I tried, connecting through AT&T WiFi,
> or wayport,
> >which is the correct way, the braille plus could not connect.
> Once it got a
> >failure to connect message, One could not turn the wireless off
> or on. Going
> >into the status menu and arrowing down
> >
> >         To the wireless status locked the unit up. The only way to get
> >things back was to remove the battery. Pressing pound star and
> program one
> >did no good.
> >
> >         I believe the signal strengths were between 35 and 54
> percent, but
> >they fluctuated a bit.
> >
> >         We decided to go to a starbucks to see what would
> happen there. The
> >braille plus found the T-mobile WiFi and connected. I was able
> to bring up
> >the T-mobile web page.
> >
> >         We decided to try another McDonalds on the way home. We
> had the same
> >results. We could get no connection either to AT&T WiFi or to the proper
> >wayport connection.
> >
> >         The unit would lock up. Going into the web page did no
> good at all.
> >Once, I was told I was resetting after pressing the appropriate
> three keys,
> >but there were no vibrations and on trying a power off, I got a power off
> >error.
> >
> >         I again had to remove the battery and reinsert it to get things
> >working again.
> >
> >         It seems that there is something odd with wayport and
> the braille
> >plus.
> >
> >         I want to try a Barnes and Noble this weekend as they
> have wayport
> >as well. I am wondering if their router will have a stronger signal
> >strength.
> >
> >         But I wonder why there is so much trouble with wayport?
> >
> >
> >
> >         Paul Henrichsen
> >
> >         paulh52@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >         Kurzweil 1000 Technical Support Engineer
> >
> >         (800) 894-5374
> >
> >         Press 5 then 2
> >
> >         or: (888) 995-9905
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         __________ Information from ESET Smart Security,
> version of virus
> >signature database 2904 (20080227) __________
> >
> >         The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
> >
> >         http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         No virus found in this incoming message.
> >         Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >         Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1299 - Release Date:
> >2/26/2008 9:08 AM
> >
>




Other related posts: