[hashcash] Re: major postfix suckage
- From: Kyle Hasselbacher <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:06:20 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
| on a related note, I got beat up (somewhat) on the postfix list. The
| people there are of the opinion that if a message has multiple
| recipients, it should be replicated so that each recipient gets their
| own copy with their own stamp.
[...]
| Opinions?
I do this inadvertently now. I send through TMDA, which makes a separate
message for each recipient for its own reasons.
The only time hashcash-sendmail "forks" a message this way is when there's an
envelope recipient who's not listed in the headers. Those recipients receive
their own copies so that their identities are not leaked (via the X-Hashcash
header) to the other (public) recipients.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBLjSszS7R/flctWYRAlRdAJ9y9I9Twc8u1EGrZGL6F34N8c1cpQCfRnsd
Hw6IZh7CZdpL12d2/2Xruhk=
=lwnH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
