[hashcash] Re: Opportunistic signatures - a proposed design
- From: John Honan <jhonan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:23:55 +0100
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
at the egress point for any aggregation of any number of e-mail users,
traffic patterns start to look significantly like a spammer. The
greater the aggregation, the greater the likeness.
now I am not talking about the mass mailer. I'm talking about the
ordinary organizations such as the typical 500 person or larger size
company using e-mail to communicate with customers and suppliers.
I state again that a significant philosophical point should be that
the ordinary communications between two parties should not be slowed
any more than necessary. this philosophical point is why I'm arguing
for something other than hashcash for known party communications.
Today I use simple white lists. I want something better.
Just to clarify something here. For the enterprise solution, do you
envisage having one/many servers minting all email being sent outside
the organisation (I'm assuming that internal mail won't have have to
stamped as it is trusted), or do you see a solution where each client PC
runs its own minter?
John.
Other related posts:
