[openbeos] Re: What happened to BeOS in your OpenBeOS plans?
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:26:09 +0100 (MET)
Besides, even if make has its ups and downs, even the Linux kernel uses make to
get built. I consider make like kinda standard, even ppl not knowing anything
on devel stuff on Linux know they need to type ./configure; make; make install
=)
Makefile rulz.
/me begining to feel as the conservative party here :^)
(not to say there shouldn't be any other, wouldn't be interesting without:))
En réponse à Nathan Whitehorn <nathan.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >Well there is another issue. When OpenBeOS is to the point
> > >that linux was say, at Rev 1.0, people will want to download
> > >it and compile it. And that means that you will either need to
> > >rewrite it all to use make or you will have to provide a runtime
> > >version of "jam" just for OS compilation.
> >
> > This is really a non-issue since we can make prebuild binaries
> > available
> > all over the place: openbeos.org, bebits; heck, we could even put it
>
> > in
> > the source tree (not saying we should).
>
> You will *really* appreciate batch building the release at some point.
>
> Trust me on this. Also, lots of people like to compile it for
> themselves.
> -Nathan
>
> --
> Fortune Cookie Says:
>
> A tautology is a thing which is tautological.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
