"Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You guys have to be getting sick of my writing by now. ;-) now way - you show such a progress with your writing skills ;p seriously though, why not Michael Noisternig write a follow up to your 'scientific method' based on the recent discussion which took place on the list? i know that a person suggesting somebody else contributing is not exactly good manners, but numerical-methods-oriented articles should always be welcome on a big software project (moreso an os project) and this one article is pretty much layed out already so would be a waste not to see the light of day. plus, although people other than Michael could come up with such an article based on that discussion, it's Michael's merit in the first place, so he should have the article authorship. or at least the major part of it. -blu