I was having a bit of a think today. Given BeOS's media focus, it would make sense to target the creative crowd. What if the devs could implement some kind of distributed computing system? Essentially a Beowulf cluster (or render farm), but built into the OS. It would need to be very easy to set up, I'd imagine it'd need a good API to go with it, and work over LAN. This would be a great way for people to reuse old computers laying around; just install Haiku, and enable distribution. I realise that it'd be a pretty massive job, but it'd be worth it to have that kind of niche. What do you think? On 07/06/2013, at 10:16, Alan Burkes <firstakir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2013 4:57 PM, "Jeff KP3FT" <kp3ft@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I agree, targeting niches would help. One niche it already has is > > TuneTracker, which we've been using for years to run our FM radio station. > > With the upcoming LPFM application window that the FCC is opening, there > > may possibly be some increased interest in Haiku/TuneTracker by people who > > are looking for an inexpensive and dependable radio-automation system. > > > > > > I would love to see software geared towards media. A user-friendly > > audio-editing program similar to Audacity would be nice. I remember BeOS > > being promoted as the "Media OS", but don't know if Haiku is promoted as > > the same. > > > > > > Also, for a possible and likely niche, several in the Amateur Radio crowd > > would probably become serious Haiku enthusiasts if there was Amateur Radio > > software written for it. Much of Amateur Radio is heavily based on > > software... the Amateur frequencies are loaded with all kinds of digital > > communications using a computer connected to a transceiver, including for > > example weak-signal digi communication via reflecting signals off the Moon > > back to Earth (Earth-Moon-Earth, or "EME"). > > > > Amateur Radio is, by nature, experimental, and radio amateurs love to try > > new things. I remember using software many years ago written for DOS to > > communicate around the world with an old IBM XT and a homemade interface > > connecting the computer to the transceiver. With the speed and efficiency > > of Haiku, I bet digital-communication software would be more effective in > > decoding received digital signals than the present multitude of Windows > > software. Linux has software as well, but very little compared to Windows. > In my personal opinion, we are not putting enough effort into the ARM port, > and I arrived at that opinion because I see the rise of inexpensive > multi-core ARM systems popping up literally everywhere, and that's somewhere > Haiku would really thrive; environments that don't necessarily have a lot of > RAM or a very fast processor. I think ARM-based computers are the niche that > Haiku needs to fill to be successful. Imagine if the Raspberry Pi ran Haiku! > > We missed the boat to get into the netbook craze, but there are still people > who want simple network machines to do simpler tasks, and I feel that Haiku > can be that OS. > > That and I have always wanted to run haiku on a tablet and see how well the > UI would stand to my stubby fingers. :P