>You misunderstand him; other file systems doesn't have all the features >that BFS has - like attributes, indices, queries, etc. >If a file system doesn't support indices, porting it to BeOS (or >OpenBeOS) won't change that. For now, only BFS provides the full >feature set. >I don't know if XFS does on IRIX, but it does not on Linux either. I don't know what you're talking about. If an advanced "OBOSFS" is created, which supports attributes, indices, queries, and all of that, but is not backwards compatible with BFS, it can _still_ replace BFS. We could simply include BFS as an option for people who are already beos users. I never said anything about non-BeOS servers; of course they don't have dynamic attributes. But that has nothing to do with what I was talking about. Clay