Clay wrote: > >But notice they could never replace BFS oterwise lots of stuff would > > no > >work due to missing functionality. > I don't know what makes you think that. If OBOSfs looks the > same to the > API calls, then it could replace BeFS, in my mind. Having BeFS on- > board would > just be nice for BeOS users with previously existing BFS partitions. > :) "nice" You misunderstand him; other file systems doesn't have all the features that BFS has - like attributes, indices, queries, etc. If a file system doesn't support indices, porting it to BeOS (or OpenBeOS) won't change that. For now, only BFS provides the full feature set. I don't know if XFS does on IRIX, but it does not on Linux either. Adios... Axel.