> Mike Phipps wrote: > > We did agree on javadoc/doxygen style. A long time ago. > I don't believe so. Erik and Ithamar (I think it was them...) noted > that they > didn't really like the graphics/diagrams that doxygen produces -- > others agreed > and E&I were going to look into what they could do about it. There is a difference between the input and the output of such a tool. Input should be javadoc/doxygen like, output (and therefore tool) shouldn't be doxygen like. Adios... Axel.