> >The MDR is *not* a division of OBOS. We allow it to be shipped with > >OpenBeOS and support OBOS's efforts, but it fundamentally a > > different > >pieve of code. > >-Nathan > > I love MDR, but this concerns me. > > I could say "everything I write is *my* code, but I will allow it to > be > shipped with OpenBeOS" > > I then go and write a hefty chunk of the kernel, and after a few > months > /years I decide I don't want OpenBeOS to use it anymore. > > I think that OpenBeOS code and software, should be OpenBeOS code and > software, unless its GPL. 1 - MDR started *WAY* before OpenBeOS. In fact Dr. Zoidberg's original objective was to start replacing every possible BeOS component. 2 - MDR uses the MIT/BSD license so the licensing thing you mention is simply not going to happen. 3 - Even if it was not, I am saying that all our code can be used by OpenBeOS. If you don't think my word is not enough, then see point 2 above. Anyway, my word should be enough. 4 - No one is forcing MDR to be inbcluded with OpenBeOS. We offered it to help in a more direct way. The option to this is easy, not to include it. I really don't care either way. Yeah, I am probably being a bit harsh here, but stuff like this one really gets me in a bad mood. -Bruno -- Fortune Cookie Says: X-rated movies are all alike ... the only thing they leave to the imagination is the plot.