"Dennis d'Entremont" <dennis.dentremont@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 18:17 -0800, Urias McCullough wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > wrote: > > > > I still think that automatically blocking an account, while > > > > harsh, is > > > > the most effective warning. I do agree that a warning along the > > > > lines > > of > > > > "Posting links to warez will automatically qualify your account > > > > for > > > > being blocked" prominently displayed in the comment form would > > > > be a > > good > > > > and fair thing to have; I could add that if you want. > > > > > > I don't have any problem blocking an account for posting a link > > > to > > > illegal content (maybe marking as "spammer" also was a bit > > > misleading > > > in this case ;). > > > > > > However, if a user has enough motivation to then contact the site > > > admins to inquire about the status of their account, and is > > > furthermore educated - I think it's worth giving them another > > > chance. > > > > That sounds fair to me. > > > > Sounds fair to me as well. As long as a reason for the lock-out is communicated to the email account at the time of the lock-out. I.e. not leaving that person in question in the dark, wondering what just happened. /Jonas. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List